I've been thinking over the last few days...that traditional approaches to KM have followed the two approaches that are doomed for failure. These are the
1. Expertise approach - The assumption being that people in the 'client' organization do not know anything and it's the expert's job to make them aware. The expert mostly does not do any implementation of his/her recommendations.
2. The pair of hands approach. The 'client' is aware of what needs to be done, but lacks the time or money or both to develop the necessary skills. This is the approach most often taken by IT consulting organizations, and this is the reason that while KM systems often come up they are rarely successful. That's because the 'client' is usually the top management and not the user of the system.
The OD consulting approach is a little about expertise and a little about skills, but these are focussed on the "how"s of a client. e.g. an OD approach to KM would involve delving into questions like:
1. Why do the people not share knowledge and vice versa?
2. What are the other organizational processes that have an effect on knowledge sharing like compensation plans, performance plans, succession plans?
3. How do the unsaid rules of the organization impact knowledge sharing.
Eventually every KM project is an attempt to change the corporate culture of the organization and the behavior of people in the organizational systems. This change can never be sustainable unless human and organizational processes change to support this change. That is the insight that traditional OD consulting brings to KM.
Maybe it's time more OD consultants started doing KM consulting, and more organizations looking at KM consulting started hiring a OD consultant.
Go here to know more about OD.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogging About
HR Issues
Social Media
Organization Development
consulting
career management
business blogging
recruiting
strategy
talent
learning
innovation
leadership
management
Organizations 2.0
HR2.0
Knowledge Management
Social Business
networking
training
talent work
skills
employment branding
Enterprise social software
Human resources
Social Networking
india
marketing
Enterprise 2.0
Employment
business books
news
Twitter
Business
future
Online Communities
Social network
communication
jobs
Facebook
personal branding
HR professionals network
Interview
Recruitment
Strategic management
LinkedIn
Employee engagement
Job Search
Talent management
personal
Community
Community Management
the imagence partners
Competencies
Social Enterprise
collaboration
Education and Training
Social web
entrepreneurship
salaries
youth
Employee Relations
Virtual community
socialmedia
coaching
lifestreaming
Human resource management
Knowledge base
Sexual harassment
Trial and error
satyam
Gautum: I think there are alot of people running around organizations who could use a good does of OD? The few that come immediately to mind are branding and communications people. (And of course those other consultants who run around organizations without an ounce of a methodology or an approach. Good post. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI agree Regina...!
ReplyDeleteGautam: your observation is to the point. Broadly speaking, there has to be a OD manager in all managers at all levels and their success in their jobs now a days [where only change is permenant] can be measured as directly linked to the ponts they score on an OD scale. [i am not sure if such scale exist??--please enlighten]
ReplyDeleteHi Gautam,
ReplyDeleteJust to clarify, does changes due to M&A also fall under the scope of OD?
yes Dharma,
ReplyDeleteHuman changes due to M&A would fall under the ambit of OD. Ideally a pre-M&A people due diligence and culture alignment should also be done by OD
I absolutely agree with your blog Where do you suggest they start from? When something has been going on or is being used for sometime it becomes more often than not a norm and an acceptable practice. For which Industry do you see a need for change is imperative and where should it start from?
ReplyDelete