Dec 6, 2006

Will getting tough with job-hoppers help

CNN IBN reports that BPOs will get tough with job hoppers:
"Genpact, a leading BPO firm, wants employees who quit without intimation or serving notice to repay costs incurred on their training."
That's the wrong way to deal with "absconding" attrition in India. The reasons why employees leave without notice is the unreasonable demand that organizations put on employees. One month notice period for an entry level job?

Training costs are not something that an employee asks for, that one can recover from them. It's an investment to do business better. It's there because organizations want to hire fresh graduates and not experienced professionals who would cost more.

Recovering that cost from employees who quit because of various reasons like the nature of work does not agree with them, or because of a scary boss, is just not morally defensible.

Update: Chandra's point is that "nothing wrong with a company who is investing in them to hold them back till break even point...else wy invest??".

But then when does a company draw the line. If that is the case then any benefit could be revoked depending on the organization's business interests. One can argue that the firm also invested in providing cab or bus pickup and drop from office to home hence when people leave , they should pay back that too to the organization.

However that doesn't sound quite right, isn't it?

The reality is that Indian BPO firms have grown too fast too soon. Cost-arbitration and hence the focus on "cost of attrition" will do no good to either the industry or the employees.

There will be a shakeout in the BPO sector and those firms that compete solely on cost will be decimated.

Otherwise such strategies will eventually lead to lesser number of applicants for the firm and more 'absconding' cases. Very few graduates get into BPOs looking for a long term career. A few might like the work and decide to stick on and perform well. A big percentage of the workforce looks at it as a source of 'pocket money' and a place to make friends. They are biding time while they study for CAT/XAT/GMAT and head for further education. That was the data when we analysed causes for attrition during my tenure in an MNC BPO firm.

In fact, there was a small trend of people joining firms and leaving them after 3 months. They never needed to 'work' as in all firms they spent the initial 3 months period in training. After a year of such 3-4 employment they got into a B School and never mentioned these in their CVs.

This will not continue for a longer term. But asking people to pay back the training cost is very extreme IMHO.



Search accounting internships at College Recruiter.com.

3 comments:

  1. well .. this is a much debated subject..going on... i think it is fair from the side of Genpact. Why?
    beacuse:
    1 why should a business exist..beacuse of creating value to share holders.
    2 For those who think the victims are those poor employees...let me assure u ... there a thousand more who are willing to work and are not getting the right break...

    it all has to do with the "culture"..... fast alluring monies..youngsters who think too much of themselves... not against them... may be i would have thought the same ...but they do not have a clear entreprunerial outlook.... ha ha they do not....so

    nothing wrong with a company who is investing in them to hold them back till break even point...else wy invest??

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did a lot of research on this with a leading Indian BPO and our conclusions were very similar to Gautam's.

    Moreover, we found that the demographic that actually sticks with the company is generally from a lower income bracket. Unfortunately, there are fewer people in this group who can speak fluent English.

    Instead of trying to 'recover' costs from employees (which honestly is not just a bad idea- but will also be a logistical nightmare)-- companies should look to train people who are likely to stay longer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bond means...a "pact"...of understanding....of commitment... "psychological contract" read below..why u need one....although w know one cannot be enforcable in the strict sense..


    Very few graduates get into BPOs looking for a long term career. A few might like the work and decide to stick on and perform well. A big percentage of the workforce looks at it as a source of 'pocket money' and a place to make friends. They are biding time while they study for CAT/XAT/GMAT and head for further education. That was the data when we analysed causes for attrition during my tenure in an MNC BPO firm.
    Thqts the exact reason
    "In fact, there was a small trend of people joining firms and leaving them after 3 months. They never needed to 'work' as in all firms they spent the initial 3 months period in training. After a year of such 3-4 employment they got into a B School and never mentioned these in their CVs.

    just quoted what said on the blog...............


    first things ....first...how many are going to a B school...like xlri.. tiss...wharton..etc...

    i am not much aware of the bpo "cluture" ...

    "culture" let me say like edgar schien is ... read the book. The whole idea is to create employability in bpos'....so once u take in the rite people....provide them training...wouldnt u like to save them till u see brighter days....
    (break even atleast??)..

    young indians are very smart nowaway,days ...and they dont have a sense of our gurukul culture...please read.. "gurukul culture'... they are nowadays used to the fast track... (not watches / sun glasses) but the same....so i dont believe in the same...

    anyways let me give a parting comment...

    my own brother who is younger to me by 4 years says....
    anna... i want to file for a h1 ...i say why?

    btw he works for a decent mnc....

    he says i want to make 120K in the us...

    i say... thats bullshit ... u hav 2 yrs of exp so what do u think of urself...

    he says...
    anna u dont know....#@$$$

    .... as a C&B guy i know.....but sigh..!!! he thinks otherwise....

    my heart and soul lies with creating employability....but not excusing the people who dont end up giving productivity...else i strongly believe ...the ecosystem will not survive.

    in a blog every one has his opinion... and i hope i am rite.

    ReplyDelete