Showing posts with label HR Tech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HR Tech. Show all posts

Aug 20, 2025

The #FutureofWork, #HR, and #HumanCapital Management: My Reflections


Over the last couple of decades, I’ve had the opportunity to witness—and be part of—seismic shifts in how organizations think about people, technology, and work itself. From the early days of ERP systems to today’s cloud-based HCM platforms, the journey has been fascinating. But what strikes me the most is how expectations have changed.

From Systems to People: The Shift in Focus

When I began working with HR technology, systems were designed with the buyer in mind—usually the finance or HR departments. Today, the user is finally at the center. Employees expect the same intuitive, seamless experience at work that they enjoy with consumer apps. They don’t want long manuals or training sessions. If technology isn’t easy to use, they simply won’t adopt it.

This user-first mindset is reshaping HCM. Legacy systems with years of accumulated data have the advantage of scale, but they often struggle to pivot quickly. In contrast, nimble startups are building tools for continuous performance management, coaching, and teamwork—reflecting how organizations really operate today.

COVID-19: Accelerating Digital Transformation

The pandemic was a turning point. I remember a joke circulating online: “Who’s leading digital transformation in your company—the CEO, the CIO, or COVID-19?” For many organizations, the answer was COVID.

Companies that were hesitant about digital adoption suddenly had no choice but to enable remote work, rethink processes, and reimagine employee experience. Entire industries had to address gaps overnight—whether it was providing secure laptops to employees, ensuring cybersecurity, or finding new ways to maintain productivity.

This shift wasn’t just technological—it was cultural. Work and life merged. Leaders had to think not only about performance but also about employee wellbeing, emotional resilience, and connection.

The Challenge of Gig Work

Another area that fascinates me is the gig economy. Not all gig workers are the same—delivery personnel, drivers, freelance consultants, trainers—each faces different challenges. COVID-19 exposed the vulnerabilities of these workers, from lack of protective equipment to absence of sick leave. At the same time, skilled freelancers faced uncertainty as projects dried up.

The volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity we once discussed in conferences as “VUCA” became real. Every day brought new information and new challenges. Navigating this was like steering a boat through unpredictable rapids—no playbook, just constant adjustment.

HR at the Center of the Storm

If 2008–09 was the year of the CFO, I believe 2020 was the year of the CHRO. How organizations treated their people during this crisis left lasting impressions. Were layoffs done with dignity? Were employees treated as resources—or as people with anxieties, families, and emotions?

This period highlighted that HR isn’t just a support function—it’s the fulcrum around which organizations can either survive or stumble. Empathy, communication, and trust became non-negotiables. Many companies even brought in counselors and therapists to support employees, acknowledging that wellness is as important as performance.

Recruitment and the HR Community

Recruitment also transformed. Some industries froze hiring, while others—like tech and collaboration platforms—grew rapidly. What I found heartening was HR leaders coming together to share lists of who was hiring, freezing, or laying off, helping displaced employees find opportunities elsewhere. This spirit of community is something we need to preserve.

Technology, Trust, and the Employee Experience

One important lesson I’ve learned: technology is only as good as the culture in which it operates. Employees will resist tools if they feel they’re being monitored or mistrusted. Surveillance-driven approaches—like screenshotting workers every five minutes—destroy trust and morale.

On the other hand, when technology anticipates employee needs and makes their lives easier, it becomes a source of delight. The real foundation of employee experience isn’t the software—it’s trust, belonging, and respect.

Putting Employees First

Ultimately, the core of HR hasn’t changed: it has always been about people. What has changed is the context. Today, we must think differently about trust, culture, and employee experience. We must move from “human resources” to seeing employees as whole people who bring their entire selves to work.

For HR professionals, this is a moment of reflection and reinvention. Are we truly adding value to our organizations and employees in this new reality? Are we building trust, supporting growth, and creating cultures where people thrive?

That’s the challenge—and the opportunity—that lies before us.

(based on my interview with PeopleHum)

Aug 12, 2025

Musings on the future of Recruiting and Human Resources - written in 2007



A couple of days ago I was talking to a HR regional manager who works in the non-alcoholic beverage industry. He was bemoaning the fact that finding great salespeople was becoming more and more difficult at the fronline level. It was tough to imagine that, as most sales organizations had been on an expansion spree. It seemed like he would have more of a talent pool to hire people from. He disagreed, saying “Sales folks who have worked in the consumer-facing industry, which is cyclical, is what I am looking for. These kinds of people are tough to find!”. Talk about specialization.


As the HR and Recruiting function evolves and complexity creeps in, HR professionals struggle to make sense of this new age, and though they welcome it , find themselves awfully short. The old assumptions hold true and yet, the contexts seem to have changed. The skills that they have built up over the last few decades as Personnel became HR , seem to have lost their potency.


HR will need to open up its silos and soak in skills from other functions, especially those skills of the Sales and Marketing functions. This will be a natural corollary of viewing employees and senior management. This will also mean that to succeed, Recruiters and other HR people will need to change their mindset. An “internal service provider” mindset will only reinforce the current perspective of the function. A “partner” approach however, also needs internal strength to sometimes say “no” to a client, or to specify what one wants from them, to be successful. A lot of us have made successful transitions to that state, however, more as individuals than by any process.


Why is there such a need and challenge for HR and recruitment?


The people who are their raison d'etre, prospective employees as well as hiring managers, are getting more demanding. They demand more in less time. They demand better service and without the frills. Faster turnaround times.


Organizations and senior management want them to contain costs, track metrics regarding employee productivity, morale and come to conclusions as to what they need to change/ do better so that they can control not just the bottom line but also increase the top-line. They want better people to do the jobs recruited at less 'total cost of hiring', they want their best people to stay put and the bottom ones to leave with a minimum of fuss.


And increasingly, the organization's customers want to know about HR policies and how they impact quality of work, because it is becoming increasingly difficult to choose vendors.


What does HR in such a scenario [and these are getting more and more complex and demanding everyday] do? What path must it tread, what roles must it play, what skills must it gather to excel all these demands and satisfy them?


HR needs to structure itself differently, to move from the current functional silos of recruitment, compensation and performance management, training, employee and employee relations to a new paradigm of focusing on projects which are purposes. HR people no longer can make choices about whether they will be 'generalists' or 'specialists' in organizations. They have to be both.


HR's learning curve has to take into account not just today but tomorrow while keeping an eye on what yesterday has left behind. It has to focus on processes, customers, employees and discontinuous change. The question they constantly need to ask themselves is "what if all the knowledge and skills I hold becomes redundant tomorrow? What then?" and build a mindset in their organization where everybody asks this question about themselves.


HR has already been an reluctant adopter of technology and now it has to show how to leverage that technology, not just save time and money.


HR careers will soon become specialized and super specialized. HR vendors will need to offer services like "How to make an FMCG company which is focused on female products a learning organization"


Internally also Recruiting and HR will keep on specializing according to industry based knowledge.

Specialized HR people will work within organizations and yet will be part-free agents advising competition too, as they find a balance between what the job demands and what satisfies their inner strengths.


HR departments will lose many of the administrative work, as employees will take it into their hands and the corporate intranet rids them of standardized processes. They will soon be able to draft their own salary heads, leave structure and keep abreast of legal trends [all the work that HR does today!]


It's going to be an age of change and lots of HR professionals would themselves find the chasm a difficult one to cross.

Jan 29, 2020

The Dark Side of the #HRTech driven #DigitalTransformation and #FutureOfWork we prefer to not talk about


I try to attend a couple of HR Technology conferences every year:n SHRM's Tech Conference, and People Matters' TechHR Conference.

These conferences are unlike the more traditional HR Conferences. There's a different energy, with international speakers, a dedicated venue for HR Tech startups, Angel Investors hearing pitches, in addition to the traditional sponsors.

Every speaker and participant is gung-ho about the amazing difference technology can make to employees and the workplace. How it will free us of boring repetitive tasks to focus on truly creative and strategic tasks.

Some of the things that HR leaders often say in such conferences are (and I paraphrase):

"We need to reskill our employees to get them ready for the coming future of work"
"We need to embrace an agile mindset and prioritise digital transformation for putting employee experience at the centre of everything we do"
"We need to deploy tools like AI and ML and chatbots to better hire, engage and service  our employees and leaders"
"Technology will free us from the shackles of a physical workspace, enabling all of us to be masters of our time and destiny creating a rising gig economy" 
I agree, all these are correct, but once in a while I wish, people would focus on the inevitable disappointments inflated expectations will bring. There is a "law" attributed to American researcher Roy Amara, commonly known as Amara's Law which says: "We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run."

Technology does not move in linearly. Every technology adopted by humans (from cooking food in fire to agriculture down to industrial and now to the interconnected digital world) has also profoundly changed our society for the better and for the worse. You can't really have one without the other.

Before I go any further, it would be a good point to remember that while we collectively have changed beyond recognition over the last couple of millennia, our brains haven't evolved at a neurological level much beyond our hunter gatherer days.
When faced with perceived danger of any kind, our amygdala, takes over with a "fight or flight" response. We still can't form more than 150 meaningful relationships (irrespective of the number of friends you have on Facebook or WhatsApp or LinkedIn). That number is called Dunbar's number, you can read about why that is the case here.

In my opinion we should have more conversations about the following in the context of the future of work:

  • Digital Transformation is hard to get right. According to consulting firm McKinsey the average success rate across industries is about 30%. That is because digital transformation requires a concerted effort  from every part of the organization, which might be at varying degrees of digital fluency. HR people are aware how a process or structural change initiative can falter, now imagine changing processes, technology and culture all at the same time.
  • Let's address the elephant in the room: Job losses, changes in work due to automation and reskilling. Depending on which report you read, the numbers are widely different. But here's an example. At a panel on HR for Industry 4.0, a person who was in HR at a paints company shared this example: The company selected a location in a North Indian state to set up a new plant. The state government was overjoyed when they heard the proposed output of the plant. However when the plant came up, it was so automated that it required just 200 people to manage it than what the policy makers expected  would be 1000-1200 people. The skills to run such a plant were not available locally too, and the only direct local employment were in areas like building security, cooks and gardening.  So yes, automation and AI will create new jobs, but most often than not the workers they displace will not be able to reskill fast enough. And it will not be a one time reskilling either. As the rate of pace keeps accelerating people will need to keep adding skills and reinventing themselves again and again. The impact that will have on the mental health of such people and the larger impact and stress it will put on the communities and social fabric is a topic that is brushed under the carpet. It has happened before too: Clay Shirky called it "Cognitive Surplus". Read a detailed summary here.
  • It's also worth remembering that global companies with very deep pockets and a relatively higher skilled workforce would be able to carry out the reskilling with much less pain, if their stocks are not hammered in the stock markets, that is. It is also a fact that most employed people are in the Micro, Small and Medium sectors, which may or may not be able to afford it, even if they want to. 
  • I have covered some of the issues of the rise of the gig economy in my earlier blog post here. See specially point number 10, in that post.
  • Let's face it, in my personal opinion, most HR people are not very comfortable with technology or digitally savvy. Most are risk averse and simply implement the HR module of the ERP solution they are already deploying. That's because the speakers at the HR Tech conferences are outliers, the innovators, and believing that some HR leaders are representative of the larger community, would be a mistake. HR Tech vendors should therefore stop thinking of these innovators as the normal and get their hands on Geoffrey Moore's classic book "Crossing the Chasm"
  • After which we come to the vendors, and some blame should be shared by the HR buyers also for falling to the "new shiny object" syndrome. The big issue with vendors, specially those working on point solutions, is that they don't have anyone in the founders who have worked in HR. Therefore they think they have a solution which meets their needs (primarily arising  out of the pain points they have themselves felt as candidates or employees) without really understanding the dependencies and processes that need to be addressed before either Candidate Experience/Employee Experience can be improved solely on the basis of technology. Finding a client who is willing to experiment with a new, unproven solution is being very lucky. Vendors need to be open to customising their product and not say "take it or leave it". Another reason many CHROs hesitate to try a new HR Tech startup is they do not want to be investing time, people, data and significant resources to a startup only to find 18 months later that it has shut down because it burned cash and couldn't raise additional funding or has been acquired by a larger player who might turn the tech for other uses, or just been acqui-hired. Vendors need to be open about their product roadmap and funding situation. Those who don't do that impact the others in the ecosystem. In the case of Artificial Intelligence in HR enough has been said about relying on past data leading to reinforcing existing biases.

This is not a rant. At least I didn't mean it to be :)

These are some aspects I think that we as a HR and HR Tech community need to be having conversations about so that we don't rush in where angels fear to tread :)

What do you think? Where would you disagree with me? 

Jan 9, 2019

Thoughts for 2019

It's been a week and a day since 2019 started. I have mostly been hibernating metaphorically. Mostly because the whole greeting everyone "Happy New year" feels not-quite-genuine

Resolutions are also not my style.

However, I have been reading and ruminating. Here are some thoughts that I think are going to happen in 2019

Benefits and Wellness are going to be big in 2019: This is personal experience . Two Benefits providers have approached me in January which means they are ready to spend money to promote it

Specific HR Tech solutions become more relevant: point solutions offer more details for specific solutions . Which is why many #HRTech solutions will be integrated with the larger suites like Workday , SAP SuccessFactors

Analytics will be front and centre: to take any advantage analytics in HR will need be to be cleaned up and answered.

Talent Acquisition and Learning will lead the way for tech adoption: Recruiting has always been the arrowhead for tech adoption.. they are also been for HR Tech adoption

Apr 27, 2015

Recap of #SHRMTech15 @SHRMIndia - a story told in some tweets

So I was at SHRM India's SHRMTech15 conference and here are some thoughts that struck me through the day, and some quotes by speakers that made me thoughtful and triggered more thoughts


So that was it from the main conference folks! Let me know what you think :)